[Matroska-users] Matrroska not worth it
Christian HJ Wiesner
chris at matroska.org
Wed Jan 2 22:58:52 CET 2008
Good man. You downloaded a MKV file from any questionary P2P site or
from a tracker. Nice. The download was corrupted and now you condemn the
file type you were trying to download, because of this single experience
?? There are millions of MKV files out there which run just perfect, MKV
is the preferred container for HD h.264 rips these days, and you dare to
question the whole project because you met one illegal server
distributing a stupid, corrupt MKV file ??
Sorry, but if you really programmed bussiness servers, i should be a
programming god ....... and i stopped programming 20 years ago, using
BASIC :-D ....
matroska project admin
P.S. http://team-mkv-homedns.org <--- a tracker distributing non-corrupt
MKV and MKA files
Patrick Simmons schrieb:
> I recently (two days ago) decided to try downloading an .MKV file,
> just to see if it was as good as I've read on the 'net.
> Now, after much web searching, forum searching, downloads, program
> crashes and so on, I've decided that the format
> isn't worth it.
> My needs are simple: high quality audio and video playback. Shouldn't
> be too hard with today's technology, right?
> Apparently not with an .MKV file.
> (VERY brief summary of my own difficulties)
> Tried CCCP pack; couldn't play the file (Possible error with corrupt
> file, missing filters, hardware conflict, etc., etc.)
> Downloaded your diagnostic tool and ran it against the file. It
> reported no EBML header.
> Downloaded and installed the VideoLAN VLC player. Surprise! It started
> to play the file! Well, for a few seconds
> before it got choppy, then crashed with a Microsoft C+ runtime library
> error. Glad to see that the BETA software at
> least got further than the (supposedly) stable CCCP pack...
> I'll be going back to the site to flag this file as corrupt and
> recommend others not use this format (unless they have a lot
> of time to kill).
> Maybe your container is technologically superior to Microsoft's, but
> at least I can play theirs without having to learn about
> codecs, filters, encoding, libraries, etc. Most people just want to
> watch the content, not struggle with it. And saying it's either
> a fault of the author's encoding, or a fault of the user for not
> having the correct software installed won't help your format's
> cause any.
> Remember, users aren't programmers.
> And, before you dismiss this as just a rant, I've programmed business
> applications for over 10 years, and have administered
> both servers (Windows, Unix, OS/400) and networks for over 20 years.
> I'm no stranger to software installation and
> If you read this far, thank you for your time.
> Matroska-users mailing list
> Matroska-users at lists.matroska.org
> Read Matroska-Users on GMane:
More information about the Matroska-users