[Matroska-devel] (no subject)
Steve Lhomme
slhomme at matroska.org
Mon Mar 2 08:57:28 CET 2015
On 28/02/2015 03:39, Chris Cunningham wrote:
> + Steve, author of this addition.
Hi everyone,
The change was made following this discussion to handle alt-ref frames
in VP8 at the container level.
https://groups.google.com/a/webmproject.org/forum/?hl=en#!searchin/webm-discuss/Supported$20container$20elements/webm-discuss/9PuJWrpjE1c/76zzUjRmqpgJ
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 6:27 PM Chris Cunningham
> <chcunningham at google.com <mailto:chcunningham at google.com>> wrote:
>
> Hey Matroska!
>
> First, let me apologize if I'm asking an answered question. The
> mailing list search function is a bad link
> <http://lists.matroska.org/swish/swish.cgi>.
>
> I work on Chromium Media and we've seen a little confusion from
> content creators around a line that was added
> <https://github.com/Matroska-Org/foundation-source/commit/d3931e8f58898b9d673661fd7221b4704ffc917b>
> to the Matroska spec
> <http://www.matroska.org/technical/specs/index.html> for
> BlockDuration (and whether it should be used in WebM):
>
> "When set to 0 that means the frame is not a keyframe."
>
> Just curious about the history/motivations for this. WebM's
> container guidelines don't mention this and AFAIK WebM (de)muxers
> just use ReferenceBlocks ... is there an edge-case where that
> doesn't work out?
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
More information about the Matroska-devel
mailing list