[Matroska-devel] LICENSE as official tag?
slhomme at matroska.org
Thu Sep 1 21:09:03 CEST 2011
I added LICENSE. The difference with TERM_OF_USE is very thin. But I
guess in a world with Creative Commons and as a coder we're more used
to that than a lenghty description.
On Sat, Apr 2, 2011 at 2:38 PM, Sebastian G. <bastik>
<bastik.public.mailinglist at gmx.de> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> I'd like to suggest "LICENSE" to be official an official tag.
> "COPYRIGHT" and "TERMS_OF_USE" may not reflect the license something is
> put under.
> I'm aware that anyone can use any tag, but strong recommendations are
> pretty helpful when it comes to supporting tags or using tags probably
> anybody else is using.
> IMO "LICENSE" is something that should be covered by those strong
> "COPYRIGHT" is most likely to be used for the copyright holder.
> "TERMS_OF_USE" may could hold the license, but is not limited to it,
> since it can contain further restrictions which are not covered by the
> Best Regards,
> 02 Apr 2011, 14:38 (+0200)
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32)
> Comment: Download at http://www.gnupt.de
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Matroska-devel mailing list
> Matroska-devel at lists.matroska.org
> Read Matroska-Devel on GMane: http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel
Matroska association Chairman
More information about the Matroska-devel