steve.lhomme at free.fr
Fri Sep 17 10:42:59 CEST 2004
Moritz Bunkus a écrit :
>>>or more specifically a new BlockGroup type (actually a
>>>BlockGroupVersion that would have value 2 in this case).
>>But this breaks things. Again. Every current parser would ignore the
>>BlockGroupVersion element because it doesn't know it and would parse the
>>block in the wrong way.
> I was wrong here. The BlockGroup can be kept, of course. But we still
> need a new block element with a new EBML ID for the reason I pointed out
Yup, and AFAIR you were part of the ones who wanted a new Block2
structure that would need less overhead. That could be a good occasion
to add it.
More information about the Matroska-devel