moritz at bunkus.org
Fri Sep 17 10:31:56 CEST 2004
> > or more specifically a new BlockGroup type (actually a
> > BlockGroupVersion that would have value 2 in this case).
> But this breaks things. Again. Every current parser would ignore the
> BlockGroupVersion element because it doesn't know it and would parse the
> block in the wrong way.
I was wrong here. The BlockGroup can be kept, of course. But we still
need a new block element with a new EBML ID for the reason I pointed out
If Darl McBride was in charge, he'd probably make marriage
unconstitutional too, since clearly it de-emphasizes the commercial
nature of normal human interaction, and probably is a major impediment
to the commercial growth of prostitution. - Linus Torvalds
More information about the Matroska-devel