[Matroska-devel] Re: Re: Tag names
steve.lhomme at free.fr
Mon Mar 15 17:43:35 CET 2004
Age Bosma wrote:
> One final thing I would like to get off my chest. I was amazed to see
> how many tags where included in Matroska. I never expected to see an
> attempt to combine all current tags into one system.
> Like mentioned in the thread you pointed to earlier the whole tag field
> stuff should be cleaned up a some stage although I agree in being
> compatible with other tag fields as well. As a step in the right
> direction we could created 2 specs. Something like "Matroska" and
> "Matroska lite" where the first one includes all the tag fields like now
> and the lite version only includes the more usefull and necessary
> fields. In the Matroska specs people will be pointed to the lite version
> as much as possible and if realy realy realy needed people can use the
> complete spec of tag fields. What's your opinion about this?
I agree. That's similar to the profiles we use for the global Matroska
specs. There could be different profiles, maybe the same ones as we
already use : portable/fixed devices, audio-only/video devices,
simple/advanced devices, read-only/write devices.
More information about the Matroska-devel