[Matroska-devel] Re: RFC 1134 - New EBML Block design
steve.lhomme at free.fr
Wed Jan 21 16:44:41 CET 2004
Paul Bryson wrote:
> "Steve Lhomme" wrote...
>>introducing a cleaner Block is just cosmetic and useless to me. Or
>>you'll have to prove with number that this Block is more space efficient
>>than the current one (which I'm almost sure it's not).
> Well, either RFC 80085 or 1134 needs to be done.
If something needs to be done it must come after the 1. freeze. That's a
matter of credibility of the format. Introducing a new Block in 2 is not
a problem. But right now we have 1. almost done and it's not time to
introduce new vital things to support. (even the new chapter flags are
not well supported yet)
More information about the Matroska-devel