[Matroska-devel] Re: CueBlockNumber

[Steve Lhomme]

Steve Lhomme wrote:
> Paul Bryson wrote:
> 
>> "Gabest" in...
>>
>>> Maybe we should create a new element and
>>> depricate this one.
>>
>>
>>
>> That would of course be taking advantage of one of the features of 
>> EBML.  Sounds
>> good to me.
> 
> 
> OK, I'll do that tonight. IMO we should "forget" the old one. So that 
> such elements written in files will never be taken into consideration... 
> We're freezing the specs for this kind of reasons. Everything before the 
> freeze can be considered as beta (and not fully stable). But once it's 
> freezed it will never move (out).

The ID is now [53][78] instead of [53][87]. The other is not part of the 
specs anymore and should not be used in the future.