[Matroska-devel] Re: [Matroska-general] Matroska Release 4thAugust 2003 ( CHIP release ) - table of working/missing features

John Cannon spyder at matroska.org
Wed Jul 23 17:51:42 CEST 2003


The sequence headers are all the same unless the stream changes I think.  If
not, they can always be attached to the nearest frame...  Since we can't
allow different streams types in the same track anyway, this shouldn't be a
problem.  I will check it out before we finalize this though.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronald Bultje" <rbultje at ronald.bitfreak.net>
To: "Discussion about the current and future development of Matroska"
<matroska-devel at lists.matroska.org>
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [Matroska-devel] Re: [Matroska-general] Matroska Release
4thAugust 2003 ( CHIP release ) - table of working/missing features


> Hey John,
>
> On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 16:36, John Cannon wrote:
> > We discussed the technical points of placing mpeg2 in matroska and I
> > think the best way would be to put the sequence header in the
> > CodecPrivate and then put the GOP headers with the I frame of the
> > GOP.  As far as other features, they can be added but this is
> > basically a reader for mpeg2, the rest will not be part of this code.
>
> You're assuming that an MPEG stream has only one sequence header, which
> isn't correct, afaik.
>
> Ronald
>
> --
> Ronald Bultje <rbultje at ronald.bitfreak.net>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Matroska-devel mailing list
> Matroska-devel at lists.matroska.org
> http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel




More information about the Matroska-devel mailing list