[matroska-devel] Re: Important decision about codec ID handling until UCI will be here

ChristianHJW christian at matroska.org
Mon Feb 10 23:52:52 CET 2003


"Steve Lhomme" <steve.lhomme at free.fr> schrieb im Newsbeitrag
news:3E480FFE.60908 at free.fr...
>
> For the codec IDs/private data, we should progress step by step.
> First we'll need ACM/VCM compatibility and we can have MPEG Audio
> compatibility in no time.
> For MPEG Audio we have :
> - MPEG AUDIO LAYER 1, no private data
> - MPEG AUDIO LAYER 2, no private data
> - MPEG AUDIO LAYER 3, no private data

Steve, i somehow feel we should differentiate between VBR/ABR and CBR for
MPEG1/2 layer 2 and 3, as some apps/decoders may be able to handle both, and
some only CBR ?

Christian



http://matroska.org



More information about the Matroska-devel mailing list