[Matroska-devel] Add some new Tags?

Steve Lhomme steve.lhomme at free.fr
Thu Aug 28 23:09:57 CEST 2003

Lasse Kärkkäinen / Tronic wrote:
>> He He. yes, good idea ! That would make the bitrate calculation 
>> unbeatable. It's the size of the data with all extra informations ? Or 
>> including codec informations or other things ? (like codec reseting)
> Block contents, header not included.
> Still not sure if lace information should be included or not. Probably 
> not..

Should not. Especially since lacing seem to be more a problem than a 
solution. According to Mosu, it is not that efficient in the end. 
Because either you use TimeSlice (which tends to be big) or you use a 
basic Block.

Not sure it applies to MCF, but you might face the same problem if data 
in a lace are not time stamped.

More information about the Matroska-devel mailing list