[Matroska-devel] questions about SimpleBlock element

[Steve Lhomme]

Yes 1 is fine for SimpleBlock. There is no Matroska v2 yet.
If Alexnoe was correct anyway, that means only the "Invisible" flag is not
usable with v1. Which you don't need and is likely not to be used anywhere
for now.

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Matthew Heaney
<matthewjheaney at hotmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
>
> *From:* matroska-devel-bounces at lists.matroska.org [mailto:
> matroska-devel-bounces at lists.matroska.org] *On Behalf Of *Steve Lhomme
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 09 March, 2010 11:11
> *To:* Discussion about the current and future development of Matroska
> *Subject:* Re: [Matroska-devel] questions about SimpleBlock element
>
>
>
>
>
> What values in the EBML Header element change to allow a SimpleBlock
> element
> to be used?  Candidates are:
>
> EBML Version [42][86]
> EBML Read Version [42][F7]
> Doc Type Version [42][87]
> Doc Type Read Version [42][85]
>
> Right now my muxer is using 1 for all of these values.  What value should I
> use to enable the use of the SimpleBlock element?
>
>
>
> 1 is correct.
>
>
>
> The Matroska File Format by Alexander Noe says (on p. 40) that:
>
>
>
> “The following flags are only defined for Matroska v2 and can thus only be
> used in a SimpleBlock: keyframe, invisible, discardable.”
>
>
>
> What does he mean by “Matroska v2”?  Are you sure the value 1 is
> appropriate for all values in the EBML Header, if SimpleBlock elements are
> being used?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Matt
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Matroska-devel mailing list
> Matroska-devel at lists.matroska.org
> http://lists.matroska.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/matroska-devel
> Read Matroska-Devel on GMane:
> http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.matroska.devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.matroska.org/pipermail/matroska-devel/attachments/20100309/bf280c7d/attachment.html>